Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 0:23:57 GMT -5
This will be, for now, my last comment regarding the highly recommended book “QUAN EL FRANQUIMSSE VE PERDRE LA UNIVERSITAT” . The first was about “ Inter ” , following the call for the presentation of the book. The second, after this presentation, welcomed its approach by presenting the “ Capuchinada ” (the Constituent Assembly of the Democratic Union of the University of Barcelona ) from the perspective of political leadership by the PSUC Committee at the UB. Underlining this approach, my comment was intended to be a vindication of “ Leninism ”, understood as a theory of the function of a “political” party and its interest, its relationship with social movements, also today.
I want now, after reading it, not so much to insist on its interest, although it deserves it, but to point out some of the new and old reflections that it has raised in Iraq Telegram Number Data me. I consider that it is not a history book, but rather historical material, so that historians can deepen their knowledge of what happened, and how and why it happened, to the extent that the co-authors provide us with their memories and the reflections they they provoke them. They are not, therefore, the same photographs of the same events; they indicate interesting divergences between them and with other important protagonists.
But they are, or seem so to me, honest, useful and interesting memories precisely for this reason, and they provoke in me the memory of the so-called “rahomon effect” the peculiarities of memories through the personal filters that some of the co-authors also point out. They also point out, as an element of possible debate, that the SDEUB survived years (only? That much?), although its life can be considered to have started much earlier and its legacy survives until much later, its triumph remains in the to the extent that Francoism, with or without SEU, was already banished from the University.
I want now, after reading it, not so much to insist on its interest, although it deserves it, but to point out some of the new and old reflections that it has raised in Iraq Telegram Number Data me. I consider that it is not a history book, but rather historical material, so that historians can deepen their knowledge of what happened, and how and why it happened, to the extent that the co-authors provide us with their memories and the reflections they they provoke them. They are not, therefore, the same photographs of the same events; they indicate interesting divergences between them and with other important protagonists.
But they are, or seem so to me, honest, useful and interesting memories precisely for this reason, and they provoke in me the memory of the so-called “rahomon effect” the peculiarities of memories through the personal filters that some of the co-authors also point out. They also point out, as an element of possible debate, that the SDEUB survived years (only? That much?), although its life can be considered to have started much earlier and its legacy survives until much later, its triumph remains in the to the extent that Francoism, with or without SEU, was already banished from the University.